Blog Post Publish Date: 2023/10/19


Git Clients Benchmarking: CLI vs. Graphical Interfaces#

This blog post is aimed at helping you understand the pros and cons of the most popular Git repository clients.

The content was created with a focus on everyday use for fundamental tasks.

I presented the solutions pros/cons and my particular conclusion and suggestions.

1. Command Line Interface (CLI)#

It is the official method for interacting with your repository. You can perform all the functions that the Git system provides using the Git CLI. It also offers comprehensive documentation, and official resources typically use Git CLI in their examples.

Key Pros:

  • Full Functionality: Git CLI offers all functionalities and capabilities that Git provides, ensuring nothing is compromised.


  • Scripting and Automation: Easily integrate Git commands into scripts and automate repetitive tasks.

Key Cons:

  • Learning Curve: For those unfamiliar with command-line interfaces, there may be a learning curve to grasp the commands and their usage effectively.


  • Less Visual Representation: Git CLI provides data primarily through text output, which can be less intuitive for some users.


  • Productivity: Repetitive and extensive use of fundamental operations can become unproductive.

More Details: Git Official Reference

2. GitKraken#

GitKraken is a comprehensive graphical enterprise suite focusing on enhancing Git functionalities.

Key Pros:

  • Intuitive Interface: GitKraken offers an easy-to-understand graphical interface, making it accessible for both beginners and experienced users.


  • Visualization: Users can visualize their Git repository and workflow, aiding in a better understanding of branching, merging, and commits.

Key Cons:

  • Cost: While GitKraken offers a free version, more advanced features require a paid subscription.

3. SourceTree#

SourceTree is a freely available Git GUI developed and maintained by Atlassian, offering an intuitive interface for Git repository management.

Key Pros:

  • User-Friendly: SourceTree offers an intuitive, user-friendly interface, making it easy to understand for users new to Git.


  • Visual Representation: Users can visualize the Git workflow, including branches, commits, and merges, aiding in understanding repository history.

Key Cons:

  • Atlassian Like: Limited compatibility with non-Atlassian tools.


  • Features: Limited advanced features.


  • Resources Usage: Resource-intensive, slowing down your computer.


  • UI/UX: Complex interface, overwhelming for beginners.


  • OS Supports Limited: Available only for Windows and macOS.

4. VSCode#

VSCode, a popular text editor, inherently provides basic Git functionalities in a visual manner.

Key Pros:

  • Integration: Git features are seamlessly integrated into the editor, allowing for efficient version control directly from the coding environment.


  • UI/UX: Straight and Forward and intuitive interface to perform basic operations.


  • Customization: Users can enhance Git capabilities through various extensions available for VSCode.

Key Cons:

  • Not Dedicated: While it provides Git features, it’s primarily a text editor, so it might lack some advanced Git-specific features.

5. JetBrains IDEs#

JetBrains offers a range of Integrated Development Environments (IDEs) for various programming languages, all of which integrate Git functionalities.

Key Pros: Pros:

  • Comprehensive: JetBrains IDEs provide a full suite of development tools along with Git integration.


  • Language Support: Each IDE is tailored to specific languages, ensuring a seamless Git experience for the corresponding programming language.

Key Cons:

  • Resource Intensive: IDEs can be resource-heavy, especially for larger projects or on less powerful machines.


  • Cost: Depends on IDE programming language, it’s only paid version available.

Conclusion (Author Opinion)#

The Git CLI mastering is fundamental before to use the Graphical solutions. The GUI solutions are made to provides agility in the recurring operations. Only use the Git GUI solutions if you understand that what’s happening behind the scenes. The GUI solutions helps to make the changes, but when a big problems occurs, probably you will needs to use the Git CLI to solve it.

The choice between Git CLI and graphical interfaces depends on your preference, familiarity with command-line tools, and the specific needs of your project.

  • If you works a Software Developer, my suggestion is mastering the use of the tool your IDE provides.

  • If you work several stacks, like me as a DevOps Engineer, I suggest using VSCode Git integration. It provides a simple UX/UI for a quick way to check the commit differences in one place, and the free version of the extension GitLens provides a simple way to perform more advanced operations like squash and rebase.

  • For Release Engineer enterprise workloads, the GitKraken sounds like the better chosen because your UI/UX brings pretty historical commits graphics. If you work an Atlassian stack, and Linux workstations are not used, the SourceTree can be a good idea because integrations with Atlassian Stack are available.